Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

        Citation:  Cherubini Metal Works Ltd. v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2006 NSSC 181

 

 

 

Date: 20060517

Docket: SH 184701

Registry: Halifax

 

 

Between:

 

Cherubini Metal Works Limited, a body corporate

 

                                                                                                                 Plaintiff

 

                                                             v.

 

The Attorney General of Nova Scotia representing her

Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Nova Scotia,

The United Steel Workers of America and The United Steel

Workers of America, Local 4122

 

                                                                                                            Defendants

 

 

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:                            The Honourable Justice C. Richard Coughlan

 

Heard:                            May 15, 2006, in Halifax, Nova Scotia 

 

Decision:                        May 17, 2006 (Orally) (Re:  Application to Strike Notices of Examination)

 

Written Release:             June 15, 2006       


 

Subject:                          Practice - Discovery - Examination of Members of Administrative Tribunal                  

 

Summary:                      The plaintiff issued Notices of Examination for individuals who were members of the Board of Examiners appointed pursuant to the Stationary Engineers Act.  The Attorney General applied to have the Notices of Examination struck.

 

Issue:                    Should the Notices of Examination by struck?

 

Result:                            Notices struck.  Once a person for whom discovery is sought establishes he or she is to be examined as a decision maker, the onus then shifts to the person seeking the discovery to establish the proper evidentiary foundation.  The proper evidentiary foundation was not established.              

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.            QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.